Archives for June 2016

One Out Of Ten Cars Coming Down The Line Is A Reject, Tesla Says

960x0teslaprod

At a weekend event open to invitation-only Tesla customers, the electric carmaker showed off its factory, and “a reliable source with knowledge of the matter” told Electrek that Tesla is now producing “well over” 2,000 Model S and Model X vehicles in a regular production week.  This immediately made headlines, and the company was declared to be well on its way to its goal of 500,000 cars by 2018. At the same event, someone at Tesla admitted that the impressive production line produces garbage, but nobody seemed to notice.

More in Forbes.

 

Tuesday morning car news roundup, June 14, 2016

Today is Tuesday

Top News:

 

[ There is more … ]

Haughty Tesla Brought The PR Disaster Upon Itself

dilbert

Management by Dilbert

The imbroglio surrounding Model S ball-joints and gag orders for Tesla customers could have been avoided, or at least drastically minimized, would Tesla not have emulated the worst trait of a certain few legacy automakers, namely their hubris and conceit.

Before the story that set the scandal in motion was published, Tesla and the NHTSA were asked by the Daily Kanban to respond to the questions that were raised in the story. Tesla ignored the request.

If Tesla would have responded, saying that it is aware of these allegations, and that according to its investigation, 37 out of 40 suspension complaints were bogus, and filed by a single guy in Australia, the story would have taken a different turn.

If Tesla would have responded with the statement that it is aware that the NDAs may cause unfortunate confusion, and that it already is in discussion with the NHTSA to change that language, the story would have turned out differently, or it may not have been written at all. If the answer would have been that all NDAs, useless and unenforceable as they are, would be expunged forthwith, Tesla would have been feted as a paragon of “the customer comes first.”

However, Tesla preferred to ignore the request. [ There is more … ]

Monday morning car news roundup, June 13, 2016

Today is Monday

Top News:

[ There is more … ]

The Salt Is Real

SaltFlat

In the eight and a half years since I began studying and writing about the auto industry in a professional capacity, my positions on the topics of the day have rarely failed to cause some level of controversy. I’ve long since lost count of the number of enraged comments, emails and tweets my writing has inspired, and I’ve even had my last name mocked by the White House press secretary during a press gaggle on Air Force One after an Op-Ed I wrote for the New York Times was misquoted by Rush Limbaugh. Once the spokesman of the leader of the free world has made an “Animal House” joke at your expense, every subsequent howl of outrage tends to fade into the background a bit … at least until the most influential automaker in the world smears you with the baseless innuendo and outright lies.

Ever since Tesla Motors wrote a salty blog post responding to my investigation of its use of non-disclosure agreements in return for “goodwill repairs,” a thousand flowers of anger, hatred and slander have bloomed across the internet. An online lynch mob, seemingly unleashed by Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk, has flooded social media, forums and comment sections with false and defamatory statements about me, my motivations and my reporting. Were these attacks in any way fact-based or substantive, we might be able to have an interesting and illuminating debate about the issue at hand. But because Tesla apparently chose to attack me personally, in vicious, indiscriminate terms seemingly calculated to cause as much harm to my professional credibility as possible, it’s time to get truly salty. In fact, if you’re following a low-sodium diet, you may want to go ahead and stop reading now.

[ There is more … ]

Declarations Under Penalty Of Perjury Re Tesla Motors

perjury - picture courtesy wisegeek.com

“I, Edward Niedermeyer, never did own, nor do I own, nor do I plan to own, Tesla Motors shares, puts, calls, or any derivatives that would gain in value through price swings in Tesla Motors stock. I never did short, nor do I currently short, nor do I plan to ever short Tesla Motors stock. I have no financial interest whatsoever in the success or failure of Tesla Motors.”

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 13, 2016
Edward Niedermeyer

 

“I, Bertel Schmitt, never did own, nor do I own, nor do I plan to own, Tesla Motors shares, puts, calls, or any derivatives that would gain in value through price swings in Tesla Motors stock. I never did short, nor do I currently short, nor do I plan to ever short Tesla Motors stock. I have no financial interest whatsoever in the success or failure of Tesla Motors.”

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 13, 2016
Bertel Schmitt

In recent days, we, the editors of Daily Kanban have come under vicious attacks, online and offline. The thrust of these attacks is that we somehow would gain from the downfall of Tesla or its shares, because otherwise, the contrived logic goes, we would not have written stories like this one. We have reason to believe that these accusations are inspired by an official blog post of Tesla Motors, which insinuates that Ed Niedermeyer and his “associates have something financial to gain by negatively affecting Tesla’s stock price.” Elon Musk never had to look long for people who read, and then present his often sibylline utterings as facts, and as a call to brutally attack independent journalists. Once devotees hang on your every word, you as their spiritual leader become responsible for their actions.

We, the editors of Daily Kanban, make this declaration to establish the facts that have been missing. We expect Tesla to retract these insinuations. Alternatively, Mr. Musk and his surrogates can sign similar declarations, and we will establish who profits from TSLA price swings, and who does not. These declarations are also made as a service to those who have publicly expressed their desire to put us in jail: Perjury can result in incarceration.

As Tesla said in a blog post previous to the one above, “this is not a legal issue,” at least not at this point in time. “It is a moral issue.”  A company with such high morals should not sink to the levels of inflaming thugs to stomp out independent journalism. Tesla’s declared mission is to “change the world.”  We do not want to live in a changed world reigned by bullies, or in a world without a free press.

There Is More Than 4 Million Kilometers Of Dirt Road In Tesla’s Largest Markets

960x0muskdirt

When Peter Cordaro drove down a Pennsylvania dirt road in search for morel mushrooms, he didn’t know he would find national fame instead. Driving through a pothole in his 2013 Tesla Model S, he heard a loud crack. “The front of the car just dropped,” Cordaro told the New York Times. “The left front wheel just detached from the car.” Then last week, Cordaro’s country road mishap made the wheels come off the Tesla story.

More in Forbes

Tesla Scares Customers With Worthless NDAs, The Daily Kanban Talks To Lawyers

Waves of cancellations caused Tesla sales crash in China

Tesla Motors prides itself of being totally different from the legacy carmakers. Indeed, it is. Established automakers have long learned that publicly blaming the customer is corporate suicide. In their own interest, established automakers rather swallow their considerable pride before publicly questioning the honor and professionalism of a journalist.  Established automakers have been taught that obstructing the work of the NHTSA amounts to grave-shoveling. Unlike every other automaker, Tesla blames its customers, attacks journalists, and implicitly calls its regulator NHTSA a bunch of liars, all in one public corporate blog post.  As Lou Whiteman just wrote, if Tesla ever wants to become one of the big boys, then Tesla needs to grow up.

On Wednesday, my partner Ed Niedermeyer drew attention to a highly questionable practice by electric automaker Tesla Motors. Tesla appears to demand “an NDA from owners in exchange for satisfaction regarding its vehicle defects.” An NDA is a Non Disclosure Agreement, an agreement to remain silent. While NDAs are quite common in Silicon Valley’s software trade, they are unheard-of in the auto-business, especially when it comes to warranty and make-good work on cars. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) relies on defect reports by customers. Putting customers under gag orders would run counter to the agency’s intentions. After our story was published, the NHTSA issued a strongly-worded statement:

 “NHTSA learned of Tesla’s troublesome nondisclosure agreement last month. The agency immediately informed Tesla that any language implying that consumers should not contact the agency regarding safety concerns is unacceptable, and NHTSA expects Tesla to eliminate any such language.”

The agency’s actions created headlines all over the world.  They also prompted Tesla Motors to write a blog post. That post embodies everything a legacy automaker would be loath to do. [ There is more … ]

This site automatically detects and reports abuse