Archives for July 2016

Thursday morning car news roundup, July 21, 2016

Today is Thursday

Top News:

 

[ There is more … ]

Wednesday morning car news roundup, July 20, 2016

Today is Wednesday

Top News:

[ There is more … ]

Tuesday morning car news roundup, July 19, 2016

Today is Tuesday

Top News:

 

[ There is more … ]

Monday morning car news roundup, July 18, 2016

Today is Monday

Top News:

 

[ There is more … ]

Friday morning car news roundup, July 15, 2016

Today is Friday

Top News:

[ There is more … ]

Elon Take The Wheel

tesla-elon-musk-picture courtesy Forbes

If Tesla Motors has a single greatest asset, it’s not a factory or battery chemistry but the immense public trust that its CEO Elon Musk inspires. Faith in Musk’s abilities and good intentions underlies Tesla’s, passionate fan base, perceived technology leadership and high-flying valuation, and excuses its multitude of shortcomings in quality and customer service. Nothing exemplifies the power of this faith like Tesla’s ability to convince the public to trust its Autopilot system to navigate them through a landscape that kills more than 30,000 Americans each year. So as the number of Autopilot-related crashes begins to pile up and Tesla belatedly reveals that one of its customers died while using the system, it’s not surprising that faith in Musk and Tesla is taking a hit.

In my latest post at The Daily Beast, I teamed up with Nick Lum to investigate why so many Tesla owners appear to believe that Autopilot is more capable than it actually is and our findings are deeply troubling. From the very first announcement Musk and Tesla have misrepresented Autopilot’s capabilities in hopes of maintaining Tesla’s image as Silicon Valley’s most high-tech auto play in the face of Google’s far more serious autonomous drive program. Now, even after the first fatal crash, they are trying to maintain misperceptions of Autopilot’s capabilities by touting junk statistics that purport to demonstrate an Autopilot safety record that is superior to the average human driver. As Nick and I discovered, the deeply disingenuous nature of Tesla’s representations erode Tesla and Musk’s credibility on a fundamental level: either they do not understand the auto safety data or they are intentionally misleading the public. Either way, they refuse to acknowledge that either incompetence or deception has created a situation that has put the public at risk and continue to stand by safety claims that don’t hold up to even the slightest critical analysis.

As it turns out, there’s almost no end to the ways in which Tesla and Musk’s claims about Autopilot safety fall apart under scrutiny. In addition to the analysis presented in The Daily Beast, here are a few more ways in which to think critically about Tesla’s Autopilot claims.

[ There is more … ]

Thursday morning car news roundup, July 14, 2016

Today is Thursday

Top News:

[ There is more … ]

Nissan’s Autonomous ProPilot: Like Tesla’s Autopilot, Very Carefully

hands-off

Nissan today entered the hotly contested field of autonomous driving like the proverbial hedgehog approaches sex: very carefully. At its Yokohama headquarters, Nissan announced the impending mass market launch of its ProPilot system this morning, and in the afternoon, the system was put in the hands of reporters at Nissan’s old test track in Oppama, near the U.S. Navy base in Yokosuka, Japan. Without human input, cars maintained lane discipline, navigated through windy curves, and kept a safe distance from the car ahead. After the test drive, Bloomberg wrote that ProPilot is like a “similar system from electric-car maker Tesla Motors.” The marketing approaches of both companies however could not be any more different.

More in Forbes.

This site automatically detects and reports abuse